Hello,
What is considered to be the root of the bacterial tree for GTDB release 202?
Thanks,
Kate Shulgina
Hello,
What is considered to be the root of the bacterial tree for GTDB release 202?
Thanks,
Kate Shulgina
Hi. The GTDB reference tree should be treated as unrooted. If your question is in regards to calculating RED, we use an operational definition which uses the median RED value over a set of plausible rootings (see https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4229 for details).
Hi. Sorry to reactivate an old post. But in case of using the bacterial or archaea trees from GTDB to infer Duplication, Transfer and Loss events in a gene tree, we need a rooted species tree. Would you recommend something in particular for rooting those trees?
Best regards,
Lucas
Hi Lucas,
I don’t have a strong opinion and the GTDB reference trees should be treated as effectively unrooted. You might find the following manuscripts useful:
Phylogenetic reconciliation: making the most of genomes to understand microbial ecology and evolution
https://academic.oup.com/ismej/article/18/1/wrae129/7713227
A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abe0511
Cheers,
Donovan